Most image-processing contexts deal with additive noise, in which the signal
received has the form of the signal sent plus a (usually comparatively small)
addition. **Coherent speckle**, by contrast, is a form of
*multiplicative* noise. A signal corrupted with coherent speckle has the
form of the source signal *multiplied by* a random variate from the
negative exponential distribution.

Another way to look at this is to say that, with additive noise, the signal
sent is the expected value of the signal received (seen as a random variate)
whereas, with coherent speckle, the signal sent appears as the *standard
deviation* of the (complex zero-mean Gaussian) signal received. This
complex signal's amplitude is then negative exponentially distributed with mean
and standard deviation equal to the source signal.

In an image corrupted with coherent speckle there are no regions of even
approximately constant signal (unless the signal is truly zero on a region),
even when the original image is truly uniform. To obtain a region on which it
is possible to estimate the mean signal it is, of course, necessary to have some
idea of a region (or segment

) on which the source signal was essentially
constant. Thus it is necessary to segment such images before estimating their
visual properties: however, segmentation depends on having some estimate of the
source signal. The resulting bootstrap problem makes the segmentation of images
corrupted with coherent speckle uncommonly difficult.

CoherentSpeckle ?

Coherent speckle arises from the summation of signals from scatterers illuminated with a coherent signal (sonar, radar or a laser) when the resolution possible with the image formation system is comparable with (or coarser than) the wavelength of the illumination, yet fine enough that there are only a modest number of scatterers within the reolution of any given scatterer. All the illumination, being coherent, approaches the scatterers in phase: the reflected signals from objects in a single resolution cell travel various distances differing by up to twice the cell-size. The cell-size not being small compared to the wavelength, this variation in distance produces arbitrary phase differences. This makes both destructive and constructive interference possible, along with every intermediate. The resulting signal then depends on the details of where in the cell the scatterers lie: at least where it is practical to treat the positions of scatterers as being random and uncorrelated, this leads to a summed signal whose form is the sum of a complex random walk. For large numbers of scatterers, this has the form of a zero-mean complex Gaussian variate whose standard deviation is the total scattering cross-section of the scatterers.

So this form of speckle is called coherent

because it arises from the
summation of reflected signals from *coherent* illumination –
i.e. the illuminating radiation's waves are all in phase with one another.

This page is an adjunct of my curriculum vitae.